When Regulators Start Deciding Deal Structure

Dealmakers now have to plan around regulators who can shape the structure, routing, and viability of a transaction before it ever closes.

Updated

What is this trend?

Regulators are increasingly determining not just whether deals close, but how they must be structured, routed, and governed to survive review.

  • Deal feasibility now depends on regulatory design, not just target fit.
  • Authorities are looking through legal form to control, data, tech, and supply-chain substance.
  • Offshore routing, financing, and post-close transfers can trigger new scrutiny.
  • Early mapping of ownership, export controls, and dependency risk can save failed processes.

What’s the latest?

The Netherlands blocked Kyndryl’s acquisition of Solvinity under the Telecommunications Undesirable Control Act after a binding BTI recommendation, citing public-interest risk because Solvinity’s clou

Regulators Rewrite Deal Structures, California Makes Power Access a Gate, and Carve-Outs Go Multi-Track

How it developed

  1. Regulatory screening front-loads deals, sponsor exits face disclosure scrutiny, and AI diligence goes software-first

  2. Power-Ready Capacity, CFIUS Enforcement, and India’s Secondary Sale Surge

  3. AI control layers, China deal risk, and sponsor exit readiness reshape corp dev

Go deeper

Curated long-form picks on this trend — podcasts, videos, and analysis, by seniority.

Stay ahead in Corporate Development (M&A)

Get the weekly Corporate Development (M&A) brief in your inbox — the developments, what they mean by seniority, and what to do next.